Academic publishers and bibliographic metadata

by Martin Monperrus

Here is a survey on the use of embedded bibliographic metadata by the main academic publishers. The data was collected on 2009-10-24. Please tell me if something has changed.

See also: accurate bibliographic metadata and google scholar


Citation_* of Google Scholar
Dublin Core
Prism
CoiNS
Elsevier (sciencedirect)
no
no
no
no
Springer (springerlink)
no
no
no
no
Wiley (interscience)
no
no
no
no





Oxford University Press (example)
yes
yes
no
no
Wharton School Publishing
no
no
no
no
Nature Publishing (example)
yes
yes
yes
no
Sage (example)
yes
yes
no
no
Mit Press
no
no
no
no
HighWire Press (example)
yes
yes
no
no
Ingenta (ingentaconnect.com)
no
yes
no
no
Sciencemag (example)
yes
yes
no
no
Biomedcentral (example)
yes (depending on the journal)
yes
yes
no





IEEE (ieeexplore.com)
no
no
no
no
IEEE (CSDL)
no
no
no
no
ACM DL
no
no
no
no





arxiv
no
no
no
no
hal
no
yes
no
no
Pubmed
no
no
no
no
Hubmed
no
no
no
yes
citeseer
no
no
no
yes
citeulike
no
no
no
yes
DBLP
no
no
no
no
Tagged as: