Here is a survey on the use of embedded bibliographic metadata by the main academic publishers. The data was collected on 2009-10-24. Please tell me if something has changed.
See also: accurate bibliographic metadata and google scholar
|
|
Citation_* of Google Scholar |
Dublin Core |
Prism |
CoiNS |
|
Elsevier (sciencedirect) |
no |
no |
no |
no |
|
Springer (springerlink) |
no |
no |
no |
no |
|
Wiley (interscience) |
no |
no |
no |
no |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oxford Universty Press |
yes |
yes |
no |
no |
|
Wharton School Publishing |
no |
no |
no |
no |
|
Nature Publishing (nature.com) |
yes |
yes |
yes |
no |
|
Sage (sagepub.com) |
yes |
yes |
no |
no |
|
Mit Press |
no |
no |
no |
no |
|
HighWire Press |
yes |
yes |
no |
no |
|
Ingenta (ingentaconnect.com) |
no |
yes |
no |
no |
|
Sciencemag |
yes |
yes |
no |
no |
|
Biomedcentral |
yes (depending on the journal) |
yes |
yes |
no |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IEEE (ieeexplore.com) |
no |
no |
no |
no |
|
IEEE (CSDL) |
no |
no |
no |
no |
|
ACM DL |
no |
no |
no |
no |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
arxiv |
no |
no |
no |
no |
|
hal |
no |
yes |
no |
no |
|
Pubmed |
no |
no |
no |
no |
|
Hubmed |
no |
no |
no |
yes |
|
citeseer |
no |
no |
no |
yes |
|
citeulike |
no |
no |
no |
yes |
|
DBLP |
no |
no |
no |
no |